Purpose

This policy outlines the performance evaluation process for interns. It ensures

transparency, sets expectations, and provides structured feedback for personal and

professional growth. The evaluation is also used as a basis for potential full-time

hiring decisions.

Evaluation Frequency

Performance will be  reviewed monthly  by the Project Manager and relevant

supervisors.

Evaluation Areas

Interns will be assessed on the following  15 key performance areas , each scored

out of 10 and weighted according to importance:

1. Scrum Call Attendance

2. Leave Protocol Compliance

3. Punctuality

4. Task Updates in Project Management Tool

5. Project Completion Timeliness

6. Project Documentation

7. Communication Skills

8. Presentation Skills

9. Innovation & Initiative

10. Team Collaboration

11. Responsiveness to Queries

12. Quality of Work

13. Learning & Improvement

14. Ownership & Accountability

15. Compliance with Organizational Policies

Each intern receives a final score based on a  100% weighted scale .

Performance Rating Scale

Score Range (%)	Rating	Meaning
90 - 100 %	Outstanding	Excellent performance, exceeds all expectations.
80 - 89 %	Exceeds Expectations	Strong performer, reliable and consistent.
70 - 79 %	Meet Expectations	Satisfactory, with areas for improvement.
60 - 69 %	Need Improvement	Below standard, improvement required in key areas.
Below 60 %	Unsatisfactory	Unacceptable performance, may affect continuation.

Key Guidelines

1. Scrum Participation is mandatory. Absences without prior approval will

negatively impact your score.

2. Leave Requests must be submitted at least one week in advance. Only

emergencies will be considered for short-notice leaves.

3. All tasks must be created, updated, and completed in the assigned project

management tool, with proper documentation and communication.

4. Professional behavior, punctuality, and proactive communication are expected

at all times.

Hiring Consideration

Interns consistently scoring above 85% with positive feedback across projects may

be considered for a full-time role within the organization.

Here’s a clear and structured  Monthly Performance Evaluation Scoring Criteria  designed

specifically for new interns.

It includes  15 evaluation points , each with a  score out of 10 , and  weightage contributing to 100%

total . This format makes it easy for managers to assess and interns to understand

expectations.

Sr No	Evaluation Area	Criteria Description	Score (Out of 10)	Weightage %
1	Scrum Call Attendance	Regular, punctual, and active participation in daily scrum calls	10	10%
2	Leave Protocol Compliance	Follows leave request procedure and avoids unplanned absences	10	5%
3	Punctuality	Joins meetings and starts daily tasks on time	10	5%
4	Task Updates	Regularly updates tasks in project management tools with clarity	10	10%
5	Project Completion Timeliness	Meets project/task deadlines consistently	10	10%
6	Project Documentation	Submits complete, accurate, and timely documentation as per policy	10	10%
7	Communication Skills	Maintains clear, respectful, and professional communication with team and PM	10	10%
8	Presentation Skills	Confidently presents work in scrum or review meetings	10	5%
9	Innovation & Initiative	Comes up with ideas, suggestions, or improvements independently	10	5%
10	Team Collaboration	Works well with team members, shares progress, and helps where needed	10	5%
11	Responsiveness	Responds quickly to PM/team queries and requests	10	5%
12	Quality of Work	Delivers clean, functional, and error- free work	10	5%
13	Learning & Improvement	Shows learning curve and implements feedback	10	5%
14	Ownership & Accountability	Takes responsibility for assigned tasks and outcomes	10	5%
15	Compliance with Organization Policies	Adheres to defined processes, ethics, and conduct policies	10	5%

Total Score:  ____ / 150

Final Weighted Percentage:  ____ %

A weighted score above  85%  is considered excellent. Interns consistently scoring

high may be considered for full-time opportunities.

Performance Rating Scale

Score Range (%)	Rating	Meaning
90 - 100 %	Outstanding	Exceeds expectations in all areas. Shows initiative, ownership, and leadership potential. Strong candidate for hiring.
80 - 89 %	Exceeds Expectations	Performs well across all areas with minimal supervision. Reliable and consistent. Strong performance.
70 - 79 %	Meet Expectations	Solid performance with room to grow. Meets basic requirements. Should work on consistency and initiative.
60 - 69 %	Need Improvement	Performance is below expectations in some key areas. Needs close monitoring and structured feedback.
Below 60 %	Unsatisfactory	Performance is not acceptable. Fails to meet expectations in several areas. May not be considered for continuation or hiring.